data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0aced/0aced01ae628b65fa5af25d0e7b20906a0366ab5" alt=""
The last update was the first post focusing on Tulsa development in this blog in what..a year? two years? So this update won't be as exhaustive as the last one was..since only a month has passed, but nonetheless, you'd be surprised. If the point of my last update was "Gee guys, look at ALL of this development in Tulsa!" the point is amplified by this post, only a month later, in my opinion.
The ironic thing is that the City of Tulsa, ever since moving City Hall to One Technology Place, has been incurring $50,000 in maintenance losses for each month that it sits on the former City Hall site, which has now been over a year -- at least $600,000 of the city's money down the drain so far. TDA is going to end up costing much more than the cost difference between the two offers by prolonging the city's ownership of the enormous site.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09807/09807516caa3b95c0d1b4a6998fe75f9a36daacd" alt=""
And outside of Brookside and Blue Dome development news.. one neighborhood you never hear about, the Gunboat Park area (tucked in the SE corner of the IDL, by the Home Depot/Warehouse Market development)--is adding a really cool new retail store, an outdoor merchandise store called Just Camp. If this doesn't just say "Tulsa!," then I don't know what does: An outdoors store with merchandise on the first two floors, the third floor with fake grass and a camping area you can rent out (with stellar downtown views), all inside a minimalist Art Deco bldg. Truthfully, the facade still needs work..it's been restored, but in my opinion they need to do something to break up the monotony on the street level, punch in some windows, a door, add a fake door or fake windows, paint the brick--anything. But it's an awesome store, an awesome concept, and it's been awesomely successful too--the 3rd floor urban campout area is completely booked several months out.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/80802/808029fc54140fa4ae0cd6cf295f672e848325e4" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f86dc/f86dcacd8ca1f039f754674104b3b2d62221aa74" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/14059/14059407eab24688e149910e525098729bf968bc" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4aa9a/4aa9a9086ea995011e1f04b28db0626e6ebe108b" alt=""
And here's the big three proposals, actual development proposals:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6c364/6c3646aca010cf0764e5e9772918947a13de245b" alt=""
Land shaded blue is part of a huge mixed-use development proposal called "Talaas." Not sure what to think of this one because it's competing with other proposals for the same land, the developer is an asshole supposedly, and Tulsa's track record with large-scale development is abysmal although this project has Flintco, Matrix, Gensler, and other big names behind him. The developer itself is Formaation, a new group that has an awesome new contemporary-style office in the East Village neighborhood of DT Tulsa. The problem is that although he has some power players behind him he does not have financing, and when asked, his answer is "layers of government programs" for subsidizing his ultra-sustainable development. He's also envisioning the development of a streetcar between his Talaas development in the East Village and the BOK Center opposite downtown, that he would pay for himself, and not charge a fair for (I guess the idea is a link between his development and BOK). Interestingly, he thinks it would ONLY cost $7 million to do a streetcar linking the East Village with the BOK, which is probably 10+ blocks away. The actual Talaas project is a $400 mil mixed-use village encompassing 49 acres with all sorts of mixed uses, residential, retail, office, hotel, etc. Reminds me of Direct Development's "East End" that never got off, so we'll see..it is different in having the local power players behind it, not to mention downtown Tulsa is a lot hotter development-wise at the moment than it was in 2006..so we shall see.
Several other projects are vying for the same land though. One is a site at 1st and Greenwood with a worthless building on it currently (the Hartford Building)--the proposal is to tear it down and construct a 3-story, 60,000 sf LEED-Silver status building in its place that will be the new headquarters of the Ross Group, a local construction company. Financing in place. Second proposal is by Land Legacy for a strip of land to develop a linear downtown park as a development catalyst. KMO had a proposal to build 50 for-sale condos adjacent to the park. If you're interested in the East Village area of DT Tulsa, definitely check out these pictures on the Tulsa Now forums.
TDA's land at Boston and Archer in the Brady Arts District drew two competing proposals that were also heard at the meeting..one from a Minneapolis-based company to develop a 40-unit project with underground parking using low income/new homer buyer tax credits, the other being from a local developer to do 30 condo units called Urban Green, with street level retail. I really wish I had renderings for any of the projects I just rattled off, but unfortunately you don't usually get that when a project is still in the negotiating phase with TDA. Why bother on spending the resources to develop othorgraphic depictions when who knows what's going to happen with the TDA..
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/aee5e/aee5e9d35d3cca44deb3affdedf12a5b87c882f2" alt=""
Here's a better geographical depiction of the proposals. The reason the Ross Group needs the three blocks (the LEED bldg will go where the existing bldg is) is so that the other two sites, currently vacant sites, will be surface parking. Their building will be bringing in 50-60 new downtown workers, mostly high incomes. As for the Lofts at 201 Park, I'm guessing that's the name of the KMO project adjacent to the park.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/63e40/63e40cae2fddbfc6773b962d3c6962e2edf0b4a4" alt=""
______________________
In closing, I want to reference this article by John Rohde in the Oklahoman. I'm not typically a fan of Rohde's, but this article is great. Rohde wrote: "Sorry to disappoint those who cling to the Tulsa vs. Oklahoma City rivalry. I’ve never been a member of that particular cult and I’m not about to join now, certainly not after soaking in the new ballpark for the first time Friday night during Game 1 of Bedlam." I'm also not one to get too caught up in the Tulsa/OKC rivalry, and I can tell it frustrates a LOT of people that I would dare even point at all of the development in Tulsa--especially when it's become my de facto response to the suggestion that the economy is why we don't see ongoing infill development in OKC. That can't be true. At any rate, Tulsa is a fantastic city, just as OKC is except very, very different from OKC--why can't a little competition be healthy? Seriously, look at all of that infill development!
1 comment:
Tulsa seems to have done it right with the ballpark. I'd caution against assuming, however, that every watercolor you see is a done deal. OKC has had some disappointments in this regard, and Tulsa has had even more.
I love Tulsa's architecture and I'm rooting for them even as they tend to trash OKC at every turn.
- Steve
Post a Comment